Strong dictatorship is better than weak democracy

No freedom in a dictatorship A justification for dictatorship is progress in that it will be faster and better. Fragile democracy weak Rule of law, freedom of judiciary and press are vital for democracy.

These types of good dictators still exist. Overall improvement of society Democracies foster growth in the arts, sciences, literature, invention, and innovations of every kind. Furthermore, there is no conclusive evidence proving that either dictatorship Strong dictatorship is better than weak democracy democracy cause development.

Fragile Democracy is still Democracy. Besides the fact that we must underline more is about dictator system. A dictator with a wicked mind like Stalin was not a strong dictator.

The program was able to raise the dignity of the Indonesian people. However, he eventually argued that imperfect knowledge in politicians and voters prevented the reaching of that equilibrium.

Difference in opinions is ubiquitous and inevitable, and arises on every topic. The Chinese government provides has better roads, railways, airports, ports, manufacturing facilities, than neighboring democratic India. Even a fragile democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for the growth and progress of the individual and the nation.

Therein lies the harassment of personality. For every opinion one man may have, there will always be another man opposing him look at this debate, for example and this may not always end well, maybe even resulting in potential Civil Wars. And in Indonesia there is a real example of dictatorship.

A strong dictator is defined by how well he can control the country, economy, world status, etc. Even in East Asia, one of the most democratic regions of the world, polls show rising dissatisfaction with democracy. And the other drawback is the president SBY is not resistant to a criticism and the President also been slow in taking decisions.

Democracy stands for freedom, initiative and rule of law. One of the best ways to measure the impact of the government system a state implements is comparing it as opposed to similar states who took different choices.

Dictators stifle the will of the people Censorship, propaganda and media blackouts are often cited as problematic issues in dictatorships, because it is important that the people living under the government not get too many ideas from sources that contradict their leader.

Though a small minority of the population suffers from violence from the dictator, the vast majority of the population will exist in a nearly crime free society in large part because the smallest infraction of the law or even the the perceived infraction is dealt with severe punishments.

Intheir budget deficit has reached billion. Problems of poverty and backwardness have not been solved despite several rounds of dictatorships in the past decades, in many countries. With such a high budget deficit, it has caused economic recession not only to itself but to countries closely related to them.

Back to the understanding of democracy in Indonesia is from societyto society and by society. Frequent policy changes with regard to business and immigration are likely to deter investment and so hinder economic growth. So no, freedom is not limited to democracy. Last but not least it would be the problem of the efficiency.

Every societies get their right in their life. There are advantages of democracy system, such as: Democracy is two coyotes and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. As the result many corruptor found and get the punishment.

Even in East Asia, one of the most democratic regions of the world, polls show rising dissatisfaction with democracy.

Init is 1. For this reason, many people have put forward the idea that democracy is undesirable for a developing country in which economic growth and the reduction of poverty are top priority.

An ordinary voter may also be lured into casting a vote on the basis of financial help or some other petty promises. Some countries throughout the world have judiciaries where judges can serve for long periods of time, and often serve under appointed posts.

Strong Dictatorship Is Better Than Weak Democracy Essays This house would rather have a strong dictatorship than a weak democracy Pros of having a dictatorship include: No elections, imagine not having to deal with all the political rhetoric, you already have your leader for life.

Difference in opinions is ubiquitous and inevitable, and arises on every topic. This house believes that a strong dictatorship is not better than a weak democracy. Dictatorship is a form of government in which there is a centralization of power while democracy offers freedom to the people for self-expression and hazemagmaroc.com absolute power of a dictatorship, as history has shown us, will result in eventual abuse and socioeconomic failure like our very own Greeks and the Romans in the past.

Democracy, as Sir Winston Churchill observed, is the worst form of government except others. Even a fragile democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for.

Democracy, as Sir Winston Churchill observed, is the worst form of government except others. Even a fragile democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for.

Another way strong dictatorship is better than a weak democracy is people under strong dictatorship don’t have to worry about rising prices.

Under strong dictatorships people also don’t have to worry about having health insurance because the government looks after them. Nov 14,  · Is a strong dictatorship better than a weak democracy?

Discussion in 'Strategic & Foreign Affairs' started by VisionHawk, Dec 30,

Strong dictatorship is better than weak democracy